Public Health at the Crossroads

About half of all public health departments in the U.S. are small and rural

2 Min Read

Mar 02, 2006


Anthony Wellever



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in 2001 that significant disparities exist between urban and rural areas in regard to risk factors and health outcomes, with rural areas performing less well than urban areas. Some rural areas face additional environmental health challenges from such sources as agriculture-related pollution and unsafe mining and logging practices. Although wide variations in local public health structures exist across the country, problems of infrastructure development are especially pronounced in many rural areas, where access to human and material resources is hampered by low population and isolation. As a consequence, many local health departments in rural areas are called upon to do more to protect the health of the people they serve, relative to urban health departments, but with substantially fewer assets.

The Study

With funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA) Office of Rural Health Policy, we studied the structure of local health departments in rural areas. We conducted site visits to six geographically disparate states (Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Washington) and 12 rural counties within the states to obtain qualitative information about the structure of local health departments in rural areas.

Access this publication in the Documents & Downloads section.

About Kansas Health Institute

The Kansas Health Institute supports effective policymaking through nonpartisan research, education and engagement. KHI believes evidence-based information, objective analysis and civil dialogue enable policy leaders to be champions for a healthier Kansas. Established in 1995 with a multiyear grant from the Kansas Health Foundation, KHI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan educational organization based in Topeka.

Learn More About KHI